identity
Proving ones identity seems to be one of the core issues that poor people face. Most people in India-- about 60%-- are born in their homes, but birth certificates are issued in hospitals. Also, the Panchayati Raj-- the local government council in each village-- issues ration cards, but in practice, the well-off members of a village tend to have them, while the rest of the people don't. Many people are just not given proof of identity by their government institutions. The funny thing is, India is an extremely bureaucratized place, and people need to produce a proof of identity to have any interaction with the government, and for many private commercial activities, like opening a bank account, having a secure residence, getting a mobile phone, sending kids to school, having a major procedure at a hospital, getting (officially) married, getting a passport, voting. The list is quite long. In the United States, people also need to show identification for this stuff, but the difference here is that its not within many peoples' means to actually get that documentation.
The main ID document is the ration card. Its issued by family, and minors can get their own when they turn 18. There's also something called a voter I-card... it is issued to individual adults when elections are held. For migrants in Mumbai (and anywhere else), in order to be issued a ration card or a voter card, they have to prove that their name doesn't already exist on voter rolls or ration cards elsewhere. In a lot of cases, they just sign an affidavit declaring that. But even once that is signed and they have gone through the appropriate legal channels, its still hard to get identification for a variety of reasons. Government officials often tack on more requirements than the law requires, and also require bribes. In Mumbai, its a bit easier to get it done if you speak Marathi. The BMC is a Maharashtran-dominated place, and they seem to give north Indian migrants a harder time.
The need to establish an identity has created a huge blackmarket for documents-- there are lots of forgeries (and people pay a lot for them). That creates a big public administration problem. It means there are tons of people with fake identities-- names that only exist on paper-- that are enrolled in school, on voter rolls, etc. And if you go through official channels, since you probably have to pay a hefty bribe to get what you need, the process of obtaining an identity may be out of reach for the poorest people. These are my preliminary impressions after a few conversations, I will have to verify everything and dig deeper...
Having this control over identity seems to be a major way that the state government can control its population, and maybe discriminate against migrants from other places. In Maharashtra, the official policy is that once a migrant has been a resident of the state for a certain number of years, they are automatically entitled to a ration card. In practice, of course, this doesn't bear out.
Some NGOs have started issuing their own identity documents that have information like pictures, names, ages and blood types. The identity cards I saw said "LEARN Mahila Kamgar Sangathan" (LEARN Women Worker's Group) across the top, which meant that the women had an automatic way to show that they were part of an organization that could vouch for their reliability or character. And while these cards aren't useful for government business, they are accepted by banks. So since the women can open bank accounts with them, they have a good way to document their length of residence. Since the government seems either unfair or rather dysfunctional in this matter, its like the NGOs are stepping in and taking its place.
I really want to find out more about this identification issue. I think it might have interesting connections to my project, which is broadly about citizenship and what makes someone a citizen of a place.